Optimitz Logo
Get App

Free Body Fat Calculator

Calculate your body fat percentage using the scientifically-validated US Navy method. Get accurate results and personalized health insights instantly.

US Navy method
Scientifically validated
No equipment needed
200,000+ calculations

Sample Result

See what you'll get instantly

15.2%
Athletes

Scroll down to calculate your body fat

Calculate

Select Your Gender

Your Body Fat Result

0.0%
-
-

Body Fat Categories

Health Recommendations

Ready to Track Your Body Composition?

Get the Optimitz app to track your body fat progress, monitor changes, and get AI-powered insights.

Get our App - Releasing soon!

More Free Health Calculators

Comprehensive health tools to support your wellness journey

Scientific Foundation

Our body fat calculator employs the U.S. Navy Circumference Method, a scientifically validated anthropometric technique developed by the U.S. Department of Defense and extensively validated against hydrostatic weighing and DEXA scan measurements.

📏 U.S. Navy Method Equations

Men: % Body Fat = 495 / (1.0324 - 0.19077 × log₁₀(waist - neck) + 0.15456 × log₁₀(height)) - 450

Women: % Body Fat = 495 / (1.29579 - 0.35004 × log₁₀(waist + hip - neck) + 0.22100 × log₁₀(height)) - 450

📚 Original Research & Development
  • Hodgdon, J.A. & Beckett, M.B. (1984). "Prediction of percent body fat for U.S. Navy men from body circumferences and height." Naval Health Research Center Report No. 84-11. San Diego, CA.
  • Hodgdon, J.A. & Beckett, M.B. (1984). "Prediction of percent body fat for U.S. Navy women from body circumferences and height." Naval Health Research Center Report No. 84-29. San Diego, CA.
  • U.S. Department of Defense (2002). "Department of Defense Instruction 1308.3: DoD Physical Fitness and Body Fat Programs Procedures." Washington, DC: DoD.
  • Friedl, K.E., et al. (1992). "Lower limit of body fat in healthy active men." Journal of Applied Physiology, 71(2), 734-740. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1991.71.2.734
🎯 Validation & Accuracy Studies

Extensive validation studies demonstrate high accuracy compared to gold standard methods:

  • Correlation with Hydrostatic Weighing: r = 0.90-0.95 in military populations (Hodgdon & Beckett, 1984)
  • Standard Error of Estimate: ±3.5% body fat compared to underwater weighing
  • DEXA Comparison: Mean difference of 1-2% body fat in civilian populations (Reilly et al., 2009)
  • Cross-Validation: Validated across diverse ethnic and age groups (Ball et al., 2004)
  • Military Standards: Used as official body composition assessment for all U.S. military branches
🔬 Clinical Applications & Research

The Navy Method has been extensively applied in clinical and research settings:

  • Epidemiological Studies: Used in large-scale population health research (NHANES, military health studies)
  • Sports Medicine: Applied in athletic body composition assessment and performance optimization
  • Clinical Practice: Utilized by healthcare providers for body composition screening
  • International Adoption: Adapted by military and health organizations worldwide
⚠️ Method Limitations & Considerations

Important limitations to consider when interpreting results:

  • Measurement Precision: Accuracy depends on precise circumference measurements (±0.5 cm)
  • Individual Variation: May be less accurate for extremely lean or obese individuals
  • Age Considerations: Originally developed for military-age adults (18-40 years)
  • Ethnicity Effects: Some variation in accuracy across different ethnic groups
  • Hydration Status: Results may be influenced by hydration levels and measurement timing
📊 Body Fat Classification Standards

Evidence-based body fat percentage classifications:

Men:

  • Essential Fat: 2-5%
  • Athletic: 6-13%
  • Fitness: 14-17%
  • Average: 18-24%
  • Obese: 25%+

Women:

  • Essential Fat: 10-13%
  • Athletic: 14-20%
  • Fitness: 21-24%
  • Average: 25-31%
  • Obese: 32%+

Classifications based on American Council on Exercise (ACE) guidelines and clinical research.

Last updated: January 2025 | Based on U.S. Navy research and peer-reviewed validation studies